 |
 |
| Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. |
|
 |
 |
| |
  |
|
Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision
|
|   |
 |
Posted by Andrew on Monday, March 14 @ 10:00:00 EST
Contributed by DFH |
|
 |
 |
 |
©2005 Los Angeles Times
March 7, 2005
KYOTO, Japan -- Every move Komomo makes is rooted in Japanese ritual.
The way her body sinks to kneel, or how she uses just the fingertips of her right hand to slide open the wood-framed Japanese doors. The way she moves like smoke across the room on her dancer's toes.
Inside this cramped "okiya," a household where aspiring geishas such as Komomo study the way dance, music and conversation can spin an enchanting mood, every action is a piece of performance art based on Japanese tales whispered down through generations.
"The dances are not just action; they are stories from our history, and you have to know that history to express it," says Koito, a retired geisha who owns the "okiya" and watches over Komomo with a mentor's possession. "You really have to understand Japanese culture to understand geishas."
Bottling the Japanese essence is the challenge facing American film director Rob Marshall and producer Steven Spielberg as they try to bring Arthur Golden's best-selling 1997 novel, "Memoirs of a Geisha," alive on screen. Marshall, of "Chicago" fame, and also a former resident of Penn Hills and Squirrel Hill and a graduate of Taylor Allderdice High School in Squirrel Hill and Carnegie Mellon University in Oakland, recently finished shooting and has begun editing the estimated $85-million-budget movie, now scheduled for Christmas release.
But long before audiences have even seen a trailer, "Memoirs" has generated an underground controversy over the director's decision to cast non-Japanese actresses in the three leading geisha parts. From the opaque alleys of Kyoto's geisha districts to Internet movie chat rooms and the cast of the movie itself, the decision has created unease over what kind of footprint Hollywood will leave on this iconic element of traditional Japanese culture.
Declaring that "my only criteria was who's the best person for the role," Marshall chose China's Ziyi Zhang ("Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon") to play Sayuri, the fictional Japanese girl snatched from her humble fishing village and taken to a Kyoto "okiya" where she becomes the most celebrated geisha of the 1930s.
Marshall then cast Gong Li, perhaps the most recognizable international Chinese star of her generation, as Sayuri's conniving rival, Hatsumomo. He picked Malaysian Michelle Yeoh, also of "Crouching Tiger" fame, to play the guiding mother figure, Mameha.
And he salted his vision of Japan's imperial age with supporting actors and extras from a multitude of Asian ethnicities.
The choice of a pan-Asian cast raises hard questions about the way Hollywood views the world outside America. By using Chinese actors in quintessential Japanese roles, has Marshall become the Quiet American director, an innocent abroad, shaving the edges off human diversity to produce an imagined Japan for an American audience that doesn't know the real thing?
Or is it a progressive act, as Marshall says, nothing more sinister than hiring the best-qualified actors, regardless of ethnicity, to do what actors do: act?
"Geisha is a part of Japan's eternal culture," leading Chinese director Chen Kaige ("Farewell, My Concubine") said at a symposium on Asian values at Japan's Kobe University last November. Chen has directed Gong in three movies, but he sharply criticized Marshall's decision to cast her and other non-Japanese actresses as geishas.
"Every action you make, how you walk, how you use a Japanese fan, how you treat people and what kind of facial expressions you have when you talk is going to be expressed based on your Japanese cultural sophistication. ... For Hollywood, however, this does not matter. For them, there is no difference between Japanese and Chinese."
The studio responded to Kaige's comments by pointing out that he once expressed an interest in directing the film. Golden, the author, did not return phone calls seeking comment.
Marshall counters by saying that he is proud of what he calls "nontraditional casting."
"I'm not doing a documentary of the geisha world -- this is a fable," the director says. "I'm very proud of an international cast. It is a celebration of the Asian community. I think it brings the world together."
"Memoirs of a Geisha" is set during the 1930s imperial period in Japan, when Japanese troops were marauding across Asia, conscripting tens of thousands of Chinese and Korean men into slave labor and forcing "comfort women" to provide sex to Japanese soldiers.
Ironically, the military government used geishas as a propaganda tool to spread the notion that Japan had united the countries of Asia in one happy pan-Asian family. In the late 1930s, Kyoto's annual springtime Miyako Odori dance celebrated such monstrous events as the Japanese conquest of Nanking, where thousands of Chinese civilians were killed in a slaughter that is still a pulsing wound between the countries.
"That's something I can't speak about because I don't know the relationship there," Marshall says. "That's not what I'm doing. I'm re-creating a work of fiction as a filmmaker ... my focus is bringing this to life."
Others argue it is critical that Hollywood pay attention to the subtleties of history and politics. The rest of the world is judging American values, they say, and one of the criteria is whether Americans can see foreign cultures as something more than a pretty backdrop, more than an exotic stereotype to be appropriated and marketed.
"Americans are too often oblivious to distinctions between Asian cultures, and Hollywood should not be encouraging that," says Merry White, an anthropology professor at Boston University who was a consultant on Golden's book. "History has to be recognized. The world is watching us, to see how we see them."
Marshall acknowledges that casting a movie of mixed cultural complexion was not his original preference. The director says he spent a year searching for a Japanese actress with the combination of dancing skills, beauty and English proficiency to play Sayuri.
"She also had to be someone who could hold a movie, carry it on her back," Marshall said. "I felt like I was casting Scarlett O'Hara." |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision (Score: 1) by GeoffDB on Monday, March 14 @ 22:43:02 EST (User Info | Send a Message) | This is typical American movie director's mind-set: all Asians look alike.
Complete disrespect and disregard for Japanese and the uniqueness of Geisha.
I have been to Kyoto's Geisha district and it is a beautiful city. I have also seen Geisha ladies and they are beautiful, graceful and very formal.
It is an insult to cast non-Japanese in a movie about Geisha.
Typical American. Typical disrespect. |
|
|
Re: Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision (Score: 1) by bc on Wednesday, March 16 @ 16:20:02 EST (User Info | Send a Message) | | It's also interesting to see non-Greek/Turkish caucasians in Troy. |
|
|
Re: Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision (Score: 1) by Nagai on Wednesday, March 16 @ 02:21:41 EST (User Info | Send a Message) | The only positive thing out of this I can see is that they're not casting a caucasian actress in yellow-face as the starring role. You do have to remember though that the director is probably being pushed by the producers to pander the film to Hollywood's (apparently) most crucial audience - middle-class Americans (who they believe to be mostly caucasian nuclear families).
That aside, most Japanese people tend to avoid being pegged with their older traditional trappings - they make exceptions with matsuri dress (summer yukata, happi coats and jinbei), but overall there is quite a bit of embarassment when they ask a foreigner about what they like about Japan and the response is something along the lines of samurai/ninja/geisha/etc. Old things equal old people here, and being old in Japan is next to being useless... |
|
|
Re: Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision (Score: 1) by Montyp on Monday, March 14 @ 18:07:11 EST (User Info | Send a Message) | And why am I interested in a movie about a Japanese woman written by a white man directed by a white man?
Imagine if a Japanese woman wrote a book called Memoirs of a Cowboy and it was directed by a Chinese woman. And they decided to cast a Russian guy cos all whites look alike.
What a joke. |
|
|
Re: Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision (Score: 1) by properspeaks (onetwo@three.com) on Monday, March 14 @ 21:22:36 EST (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.asiavists.org | These issues won't end anytime soon.
However, there's a lot we can do to remedy the problem.
I was really inspired by being able to see and participate in the Missed Sigh Gone counter-production this past February. It obviously didn't have the national platform Miss Saigon did, but it still reached out to many people who would have not otherwise listened to our concerns and message.
I highly encourage all of you who take issue with productions such as Memoirs of a Geisha to get involved in your own productions--whether they be literature, music, poetry, or dance. Art based movements are a critical part in fighting oppression because of the aesthetics, its ability to let people hear anger beyond the screaming and kicking, its ability to literally show pain and struggle, and its ability to show hope and love. We have a right to express our anger, but the way we choose to channel it can either gain or lose our sisters and brothers.
Charles |
|
|
Re: Marshall Defends Controversial 'Geisha' Casting Decision (Score: 1) by Chinamerican on Sunday, July 17 @ 06:23:48 EDT (User Info | Send a Message) | I support Marshall's decision to choose the most qualified actor for the job. Unless there were enough Japanese actresses that could very well pull off the "Japanese cultural sophistication" that Chen Kaige mentioned, I don't understand why some other Asian actress couldn't have been chosen for the role. I honestly don't see any racist intent behind this.
And it's not like he didn't try:
The director says he spent a year searching for a Japanese actress with the combination of dancing skills, beauty and English proficiency to play Sayuri.
I think Gong Li and Michelle Yeoh are wonderful actresses, Zhang Zi Yi not so much.
American directors cast actors/actresses of different nationalities in their films (i.e. Nicole Kidman, Ewan MacGregor, Jason Statham, Charlize Theron, etc) so I don't understand why we're using the "they all think we look the same" argument either.
Case in point: Charlize Theron is of South African nationality and she was chosen to play a woman that was born and bred in Michigan. She won an Oscar for her role b/c she was a great actress, not b/c she was a great American actress, not b/c she was a great South African actress, but b/c she delievered a great performance. Where was the hub bub then?
I understand that there is still a lot of bad blood between the Japanese and Chinese but the casting is about who's best for the job, not international politics.
|
|
|
|